one hundred eighty four

[exomeme]

     

we are one Please do not post pictures using table codes!  Please use <img src=""> for phone anons!  (and label links!)   • ip logging is off • anon is on • do not spam delicious links post glossary/wiki mod alert post sncj search meme search fy-exo image search fyeahs image search positive search terms lu sesoobaekchanlaysoo chan kaitaoxiuchen last page |  flat view

Comments

Re: ^

[(Anonymous)]

it depends on whether kris signed an individual deal with the company. if so, they will be able to go after him. normally i think the case would be for them to sign with sm directly and sm's employment contracts with the members stipulate that the members have to turn up for the filming of such advertisements. therefore the advertisers will go after sm since it's likely they signed with sm directly -- anyway they can't sue both, no such thing as double recovery, and it doesn't matter who they sue as long as they get back their money and sm has deeper pockets

either way there has been a breach and sm will have to pay. the issue here now is whether kris' contract is decided to be valid, if the court annuls it, he will be free from all contractual obligations ab initio, unfortunately