♡ bombameme ♡ ([personal profile] exomeme) wrote2014-07-03 09:23 pm

part two hundred and ten

      

good luck!
may the best team win ୧(﹒︠ᴗ﹒︡)୨

Please do not post pictures using table codes! 
Please use <img src=""> for phone anons! 
(and label links!)  

• ip logging is off
• anon is on
• stay anon
• do not spam

links post
glossary/wiki
mod alert post 

meme • sncj • fyexo • fyeahs 

world cup: exomeme edition 

congratulations team doppar & team chenshine!
round one: 07-08 00:00 UTC - 07-10 23:59 UTC

last page |  flat view  | games | opening ceremony




Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:26 am (UTC)(link)
da do you mean the op? that was just a rallying post it wasn't even assholish in my opinion. nothing "hostile" about it

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
ddda i think they meant the first comment on the rallying post

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
lol then that was imo very trollishly worded and plenty of chenons told them not to be that way

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
lol it's not as you can see from the reply after yours

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
yes it was. i just assumed you knew the one i was talking about since it was obvious rly

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
smh thats isnt a rallying post. thats gone past being competitive

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:29 am (UTC)(link)
what? it was just qt imo

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
i meant the one anon mentioned btw. why would i have a problem with the initial post

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
da wtf it was trying to be supportive to chenons who were obviously disappointed about their loss. i rmr anons saying that the playful smacktalk was something they were looking forward to?

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
holy shit IM NOT TALKING ABOUT THAT POST

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:32 am (UTC)(link)
THEN CLARIFY jk i realized that from your other responses but was too lazy to correct it lol

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:35 am (UTC)(link)
sorry mb, just when i had to clarify it 3 times i was a bit -_- i just thought people knew what was being referred to

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2014-07-05 03:39 am (UTC)(link)
no lmao it's all on me i didn't look at your responses beforehand u_u and i think a lot of anons are just riled up