♡ bombameme ♡ ([personal profile] exomeme) wrote2014-08-16 11:28 am

part two hundred and thirty two

h z t  
    

Please do not post pictures using table codes! 
Please use <img src=""> for phone anons! 
(and label links!) 

• ip logging is off
• anon is on
• stay anon
• do not spam

links post
glossary/wiki
mod alert post 

meme
 • sncj • fyeahs 

last page
 | flat view
 
*fic rec voting links: 1 2 3 
 

Re: itt

(Anonymous) 2014-08-18 06:07 pm (UTC)(link)
da why?

Re: itt

(Anonymous) 2014-08-18 06:09 pm (UTC)(link)
dda i'm also curious lol

Re: itt

(Anonymous) 2014-08-18 06:22 pm (UTC)(link)
see below lol

Re: itt

(Anonymous) 2014-08-18 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
just to be clear, i don't think it's that they are homophobic, but that it could be more likely that they are.

it's like with brojobs. i feel like they're ok with doing fanservice bc they think of it as just a tool bc it's not like a 'real' relationship with 'real' feelings, but the moment they'd be faced with homosexuality as a reality, they'd take a step back and be all "no" like siwon. and partly bc (and this is more personal), i feel like if you really respect homosexuality, you'll do the fanservice w/o being all gay chicken about it (ex. jjongtae internet war vs. [and this is just an example] xiuhan gee kiss), bc the gay chicken, even if it can be cute, still stinks of slight homophobia bc someone shirks away. and opgers are more of the latter kind. :/

there's more but i'm not so coherent rn lol